WP92: Ethnically dominated party systems and the quality of democracy: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa

Welcome to the Afrobarometer publications section. For short, topical analyses, try our briefing papers (for survey rounds 1-5) and dispatches (starting with Round 6). For longer, more technical analyses of policy issues, check our policy papers. Our working papers are full-length analytical pieces developed for publication in academic journals or books. You can also search the entire publications database by keyword(s), language, country, and/or author.

Can't find a document?

As we work to upgrade our website, occasional technical issues may cause some links to break and some documents to be temporarily unavailable. If you're unable to find a specific document, please email snkomo@afrobarometer.org

Filter content by:

Working papers
Dowd, Robert A. and Michael Driessen

This paper is devoted to assessing whether and how the extent to which party systems are ethnicallydominated affects the quality of democracy. Using Afrobarometer survey data, we devise a new indexfor measuring levels of ethnic voting (CVELI) and statistically test its relationship to measures of thequality of democracy. From sub-Saharan Africa, we find evidence to suggest that the extent to whichparty systems are ethnically dominated does negatively affect certain measures of the quality ofdemocracy. Where all or most political parties are ethnically based parties, there is less respect forcivil liberties, elections are perceived to be less free and fair, people are less satisfied with the delivery of public goods and report a greater degree of corruption in government. We conclude that, all elsebeing equal, the quality of democracy may be enhanced by implementing integrative electoral systemsand promoting economic and social conditions that are likely to decrease the supply of, in addition tothe demand for, ethnically based parties.