AD132: Of the people, for the people? Attitudes toward sharing of resource revenues in Mozambique

Introduction

Bienvenue à la section des publications d’Afrobaromètre. Pour des brèves analyses d’actualité, veuillez voir nos notes informatives (pour les séries d’enquêtes 1-5) et dépêches (à partir de la Série 6). Pour des analyses plus longues et techniques, se focalisant sur des questions de politique, regardez nos documents de politique. Nos documents de travail sont des analyses approfondies destinées à la publication dans des revues académiques ou des livres. Vous pouvez aussi rechercher dans toute la base des publications à partir des mots-clés, la langue, le pays, et/ou l’auteur.

Filter content by:

Graph: Who benefits most from exploitation of natural resources? | Mozambique | 2015
Dépêches
2017
132
Andreas Kopf and Thomas Isbell

DISPONIBLE SEULEMENT EN ANGLAIS ET PORTUGAIS.

Plagued by the dramatic implications of 15 years of civil war, widespread corruption, and natural disasters, Mozambique’s social and economic development has long lagged behind that of many neighbouring countries. Although the nation has achieved significant economic growth since the end of its civil war in 1992, infrastructure development remains low and poverty high – indicators that many analysts blame on weak government performance and corruption (Guardian, 2013; Harrison, 1999). After years of dependence on foreign aid, large-scale international investments in coal, “heavy sands” (ore deposits), and natural gas during the past decade raised high hopes for economic gains (Ross, 2014; Hanlon, 2010). Yet almost half the population – and in some provinces far more – still live in poverty, and economic inequality has actually increased (World Bank, 2016). For many, the influx of investment in the mining sector has not translated into better lives but into displacement of local communities (Mail & Guardian, 2014).

This dispatch uses Afrobarometer survey data to explore public perceptions and attitudes concerning the sharing of revenues derived from Mozambique’s natural resources. Not quite half of Mozambicans say the government is doing well in ensuring that ordinary citizens benefit from the exploitation of natural resources, although views differ significantly by province. Respondents who are poor, lack a formal education, or see themselves as worse off than other Mozambicans are least satisfied with the government’s performance in ensuring equitable sharing.  

The ruling party and the mining companies are most frequently seen as the greatest beneficiaries of resource wealth, and a substantial proportion of Mozambicans voice opposition to the displacement of families to make way for natural-resource exploitation.